From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GDB Woes Continued...
Date: 1998/02/04
Date: 1998-02-04T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.886601304@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: rracine-0402980743550001@rjr1287.draper.com
Roger said
<<1) Most people do not have access to the beta versions of commercial
OSes. They have the "broken version you can buy in stores". And those
computers have -lots- of other programs installed.>>
No, that's quite wrong, most people have the OSR2 version of Win95, because
that's what comes preinstalled. Remember that Microsoft's proposal to allow
the old (store available) version to be installed by OEM's as a solution to
getting rid of explorer was widely regarded as a completely unreasonable
response to the government suit.
So unless you are in the very small minority (at this stage) who is running
the original version of WIn95, you are probably already running OSR2.
<<Do you have any idea on what configurations of Windows platforms your
testers are testing? Are they all using some pre-release version, or a
"clean" machine used only for Ada development?>>
No one is using pre-releases of any kind, we are using the current version
of Win95, as distributed by Microsoft preinstalled on OEM machines. Yes, it
is a pity you can't buy this in a store, but complain to MS about this, not
to us!
<<2) If you care about the unsupported folks out here (which it seems you
do, or you would not be responding) have relative novices (with the
platform and the download procedure) go through the installation process
and the documentation available on the server. Many people are going to
simply download the .EXE files and install. That is what they are used to
for commercial products, shareware and freeware. Do not suggest that they
build the product from source code. They have better things to do with
their time (and disk space).>>
No one is for a moment suggesting to anyone that they build the NT version
from sources. You never saw me or anyone else suggest this. In fact this
build is quite tricky, and we advise trying it only if you know what you
are doing!
<<3) Do not assume that the users of your unsupported version are not
important to your economic success. Some are evaluating the language, the
product, or the company. If they find a robust product, at least as good
as what they are used to, the language will get more converts, and you
will get more supported customers. Lots of winners!>>
Actually we do NOT encourage people to use the public version for evaluation.
If you want to evaluate GNAT, you should contact our sales department
regarding evaluation licenses. For any proprietary product, this is the
procedure you would normally follow anyway, and it is still the best
approach for GNAT.
We make the public version available for students and other casual users,
and it is useful in that mode for spreading the use of the language, but
the public version of GNAT most definitely is NOT intended for serious
evaluation purposes. For one thing, one of the most important aspects of
the use of the GNAT technology is the support that we can provide, and
if you are doing a serious evaluation of GNAT, you should also evaluate
that support!
Finally, as I noted before, we do NOT encourage the use of Win95 for
serious software development. We attempt to make sure that the NT version
works on Win95, since for student use particularly this is valuable, but
it is clear that WIn95 is not suitable for software development where any
Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-02-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-01-31 0:00 GDB Woes Continued wanker
1998-01-31 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1998-02-02 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1998-02-02 0:00 ` wanker
1998-02-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-03 0:00 ` Ronald Cole
1998-02-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1998-02-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-02-09 0:00 ` Martin C. Carlisle
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Andrew Lynch
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-02 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-02-04 0:00 ` John English
1998-02-04 0:00 ` nA edisA Nick Roberts
1998-02-02 0:00 ` GDB Woes Continued Martin C. Carlisle
1998-02-03 0:00 ` vonhend
1998-02-02 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-02-02 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96
1998-02-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-02-02 0:00 Robert Dewar
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Anonymous
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-02 0:00 tmoran
1998-02-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-02 0:00 ` wanker
1998-02-03 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96
1998-02-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox