From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Redundant With Remover
Date: 1998/02/03
Date: 1998-02-03T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.886515827@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 886514539.1408368642@dejanews.com
JD asks
<<I've been trying to use gnatf, but it doesn't get very far. It keeps on
failing at various packages saying they aren't predefined, yet as far as
I know, they are: unchecked_deallocation, calendar, system, etc. Anyway
to specify which packages it should ignore as being 'predefined'?
>>
Sounds like some kind of usage error. We certainly use gnatf all the
time on the GNAT sources for finding unused withs. Actually an
improvement planned for the near future is to integrate this processing
into the compiler so that it is automatic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-02-03 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-01-30 0:00 Redundant With Remover spoons
1998-01-31 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1998-01-31 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1998-02-01 0:00 ` Robert S. White
1998-02-01 0:00 ` wiljan
1998-02-03 0:00 ` spoons
1998-02-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1998-02-16 0:00 ` Oliver.Kellogg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox