From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
Date: 1997/07/06
Date: 1997-07-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.868213794@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 33BFB5C2.5295597C@gte.net
Yasmiin said
<<But my lament is the industry has been here beefore and learned its
lesson. Remember those days before the wide availability of COBOL on
Minis when business apps were writen in Fortran ? Well I have to say
giving the poor business programmer C or Ada or C++ is just as bad --
and its poor me who has to audit and read that code -- help.
>>
I find this judgment surprising, but perhaps it is just uninformed. In
fact Ada 95 with a full implementation of the systems programming annex,
including high precision decimal arithmetic with control over rounding,
and full editing, very similar to what COBOL provides, is an extremely
attractive replacement for COBOL. In fact I really don't see any reason
to choose OO COBOL over Ada 95 for this kind of programming (other than
non-technical reasons like existing programmer knowledge, although these
days, with the Y2K problem looming, it is harder to hire competent COBOL
programmers (and more expensive) than to hire Ada programmers.
I quite understand that you have had trouble with C++ used for this purpose,
since it seems totally unsuitable, but I would be very interested if you
have audited Ada 95 code making use of the IS annex that you have found
unreadable (indeed it would be most interesting to know who is using
Ada 95 for this purpose today).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-07-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-18 0:00 Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice Robert I. Eachus
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Paul Van Bellinghen
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-23 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-07-03 0:00 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1997-07-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-07-06 0:00 ` Yasmiin S. Davis
1997-07-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1997-07-07 0:00 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1997-07-04 0:00 ` Paul Van Bellinghen
1997-07-13 0:00 ` Ken Mays
1997-07-13 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1997-07-14 0:00 ` Ken Mays
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Steve Jones - JON
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Anonymous
1997-07-17 0:00 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Don Harrison
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Nick Leaton
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Don Harrison
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Bertrand Meyer
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Nick Leaton
1997-07-22 0:00 ` Dr. Vladimir Il'ich Fomin
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Donovan Baarda
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Roy Grimm
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Joachim Durchholz
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Don Harrison
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-28 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1997-06-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-06-13 0:00 Paul Van Bellinghen
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen FOU.TD/DELAB
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-20 0:00 ` nma123
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-25 0:00 ` Van Snyder
1997-06-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-30 0:00 ` Ralph Paul
1997-07-02 0:00 ` Joerg Rodemann
1997-07-02 0:00 ` Joerg Rodemann
1997-07-02 0:00 ` Ralph Paul
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1997-06-19 0:00 ` Anonymous
1997-07-22 0:00 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox