From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Some questions on a library design
Date: 1997/06/22
Date: 1997-06-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.866984383@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bc7c41$a3f397a0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com
Nick says
<<In theory, but not often in practice. And in no case is the inefficiency of
the extra tag removed, nor of the dynamic tag checking (and sometimes
dynamic access checking).
>>
Several points here. I do not understand the "theory, not often in practice"
comment here. The original post seems exactly correct, and I cannot see Nick's
objection.
"inefficiency of the extra tag removed
"
Also not understandable, there is no requirement in the language for any
"extra tag" here. Some implementations may have various inefficiencies, but
if you are claiming that there is some fundamental inefficiency here, the
basis of this claim is unclear.
"dynamic tag checking"
This is entirely optional, how can you complain about an option?
"dynamic access checking"
This is entirely optional, how can you complain about an option?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-16 0:00 Some questions on a library design Brian Rogoff
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1997-06-21 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1997-06-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox