From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Address to function pointer conversion
Date: 1997/06/20
Date: 1997-06-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.866852244@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 33A74403.4B7C@sprintmail.com
John said
<<Thank you Robert, that answers my question. I didn't know whether this
pragma was available for access-to-subprogram types. (I was making an
informed guess.)
>>
It is obviously not *required* to be available, but it likely will work fine.
If it is rejected, this is a red flag that the interface will not work.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-13 0:00 Address to function pointer conversion Michael Paus
1997-06-13 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-17 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-25 0:00 ` Michael Paus
1997-06-13 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Michael Paus
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-06-16 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-14 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox