From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Deallocating Task objects
Date: 1997/02/15
Date: 1997-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.856037807@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bc1b53$fb0251c0$829d6482@joy.ericsson.se
Jonas asks
<<I wonder if somebody can confirm that my interpretation of this sentence
is correct. Below I have attached a small tasking example with one
Main_Task that dynamically allocates Sub_Tasks and I want to be absolutely
sure that the storage used for the Sub_Tasks have been reclaimed when the
Main_Task instance, A_Main_Task, goes out of scope.
>>
I would not call this garbage collectoin in any sense. it is more like
the PL/1 area concept. Note that you can trivially do something like
this yourself by using the storage pools mechanism. Indeed the way this
is accomplished at least in GNAt is precisely by using the storage pools
mechanism.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-02-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-02-15 0:00 Deallocating Task objects Jonas Nygren
1997-02-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1997-02-17 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1997-02-18 0:00 ` Robert L. Spooner
1997-02-18 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-02-18 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-20 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1997-02-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox