comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Question about base types
Date: 1997/02/11
Date: 1997-02-11T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.855670914@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 32FF717F.918@elca-matrix.ch


Robert said

   <<type Real is digits 7 range 0.0 .. 1.0;

   as in the original result, you will still get an unconstrained 7 digit
   base type.>>

Mats said

<<Now I know that this is not true for any reasonable implementation
  because floating point base types are always created from a finite set
  of representations available on the machine, but according to the RM
  there could exist a legal implementation of Ada 95 for which 100.0 is a
  possible value of Real'Base in variant (2) but not in variant (1). Or am
  I missing soemthing ? (If I am, then the RM is confusing).>>

Robert says

I was definitely only talking about imaginable implementations. You cannot
imagine an implementation that has a 7 digit floating machine type which
excludes the value 100.0.

That's in the same realm as noting that the above declaration may raise
Storage_Error!

And I see nothing in the RM that would stop you choosing this base type
in both cases if your machine actually had it!





  reply	other threads:[~1997-02-11  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-01-26  0:00 Question about base types Matthew Heaney
1997-01-27  0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-30  0:00   ` Matthew Heaney
1997-01-30  0:00     ` Matthew Heaney
1997-01-30  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-30  0:00       ` Matthew Heaney
     [not found]     ` <EACHUS.97Feb3221558@spectre.mitre.org>
     [not found]       ` <dewar.855063927@merv>
     [not found]         ` <EACHUS.97Feb6145918@spectre.mitre.org>
     [not found]           ` <dewar.855276722@merv>
1997-02-07  0:00             ` Mats Weber
1997-02-08  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-10  0:00                 ` Mats Weber
1997-02-11  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar [this message]
     [not found]         ` <32FB45D4.2160@watson.ibm.com>
1997-02-10  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-08  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-09  0:00     ` Matthew Heaney
1997-02-09  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-09  0:00         ` Matthew Heaney
1997-02-10  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1997-02-10  0:00       ` Larry Kilgallen
1997-02-11  0:00   ` Robert I. Eachus
1997-02-12  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-27  0:00 ` Mats Weber
1997-01-28  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
1997-01-29  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-28  0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1997-01-28  0:00   ` Mats Weber
1997-01-29  0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1997-01-30  0:00   ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox