From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Key Abstraction that is coming
Date: 1997/01/09
Date: 1997-01-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.852813316@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.GSO.3.93.970106111348.1895A-100000@sky.net
John Howard said
"OpenDoc parts and part handlers. Possibly created as portable Java
applications (not applets or necessarily written in Java language). The
OpenDoc environment is well suited for developing software."
Ouch, that's confusing terminology (a Java application not written in
Java). How about using the terminology "JVM application" to keep things
clear?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-12-31 0:00 What is wrong with OO ? Ell
1996-12-31 0:00 ` Ian Joyner
1996-12-31 0:00 ` Robert C. Martin
1997-01-01 0:00 ` Tom Bushell
1997-01-02 0:00 ` Thaddeus L. Olczyk
1997-01-03 0:00 ` Case Tools for OO (was Re: What is wrong with OO ?) Mark Smith
1997-01-03 0:00 ` APEX - WAS: " Nigel Tzeng
1997-01-03 0:00 ` Software Development Environments (Was: " Stephen Riehm
1997-01-03 0:00 ` Nigel Tzeng
1997-01-04 0:00 ` "Paul E. Bennett"
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Key Abstraction that is coming Mark Smith
1997-01-06 0:00 ` John Howard
1997-01-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1997-01-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Software Development Environments (Was: What is wrong with OO ?) Tom Bushell
1997-01-06 0:00 ` drush
1997-01-06 0:00 ` drush
1997-01-07 0:00 ` What is wrong with OO ? drush
1996-12-31 0:00 ` Nigel Tzeng
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox