From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Root of a GNAT problem (was: Gnat v3.05 bug or compilation problem
Date: 1996/12/09
Date: 1996-12-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.850182311@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 58h6n2$2hbi@info4.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Peter Herman said
Your inquiry above will lead to a repost by Robert Dewar, in which he will
explain that you should have reported this to report@gnat.com.
Of course you are not a paying customer and therefore your report
will be of lowest priority and possibly never considered.
On the contrary, all reports will be considered, and many such reports
in the past have been corrected.
In the past, a very large world-wide community of volunteers sent their
bug reports which were neatly classified and the status of the bug
could be traced. Times have changed due to lack of sponsoring.
But unfortunately, the mechanism too, which I personally consider
a great disadvantage for all of us volunteers and especially for ACT.
I see that non-paying customers would like to get free support of this
kind, and would consider it an advantage, but tracking bugs externally
and corresponding on their status is time consuming, and is a service
we provide only for our customers.
The important point is the traceability of a bug inquiry.
If this is no more given, then the number of volunteer reports,
which IS a kind of energy/money too, will go dramatically down.
In the past, I gave several dozens of bug reports although
this has never been publicly recognized in e.g. a list of contributors.
Nevertheless I am satisfied with the feeling to have contributed to
the maturing of a good product GNAT.
And I am pleased to say that we have many volunteers who continue to
send us useful bug reports, no doubt on a similar basis of satisfaction
to help contribute.
Today: Why should I send a bug report?:
-- Will they care?
Absolutely, all bug reports get looked at and if there is a bug,
fixed in a future version. We are pleased to receive such
reports. They may have low priority, but they will get looked at.
-- Did they receive it?
You should get a response acknowledging the receipt of the report.
If you do not, you should assume we did not receive it. This response
may sometimes take a few days to appear.
-- Did they classify my bug?
Yes, eventually all reported bugs get filed, classified and
examined (e.g. if they are a simple misunderstanding, then
we discard them, but if they show a real bug, we file them).
-- Is my problem already known there?
-- Is it fixed in Version 3.07?
It would take us time that is not directly helpful to us. These are
the kind of services, along with figuring out work arounds and
user problems in Ada and the use of GNAT, that we provide on a
supported basis.
Our primary priority is support for paying customers. Our secondary priority
is continuing development and improvement of the system. As part of this
continuing development, we certainly spend time looking at bug reports from
non-supported users, but this is definitely not a priority activity, and we
work to minimize the amount of effort required for such activities.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-12-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <01bbdc70$2e557160$262a6282@cln49ae>
1996-11-27 0:00 ` Slice and Unbounded String Robert A Duff
1996-11-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Ben Brosgol
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Gnat v3.05 bug or compilation problem MAKOUDI Jaouad (Stag. Kermarrec)
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Root of a GNAT problem (was: " Peter Hermann
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1996-12-12 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-12 0:00 ` John Cosby
1996-12-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-18 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-12-18 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1996-12-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-11-27 0:00 ` Slice and Unbounded String Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox