From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada 83 - avoiding unchecked conversions.
Date: 1996/11/29
Date: 1996-11-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.849275146@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 329C63BC.41C6@lmco.com
Mary asks
"we have two 16 bit integers which we need to assemble into a single 32
bit integer (one is high order, the other low order). We wish to avoid
unchecked conversion if we can. Is there a standard accepted way of
doing this?
"
I always wonder when people say "I want to do X without using the obvious
method for doing X". Can you explain why you don't want to use unchecked
conversion here. Is there a real technical reason, or simply some kind
of arbitrary rule in action?
Of course you can do this assembly using multiplication (X * 2**16 + y).
which is more appropriate depends on EXACTLY the abstract semantics of
what you are doing (I mean which of unchecked conversion or multiplication)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-11-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-11-27 0:00 Ada 83 - avoiding unchecked conversions Ensco Vendor
1996-11-27 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-11-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-12-01 0:00 ` Darel Cullen
1996-11-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-12-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-12-10 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
[not found] <md5:8B831999BCF200C6E70994BDF6CC529F>
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Chris Sparks (Mr. Ada)
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Dewi Daniels
1996-12-12 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-12-17 0:00 ` Eric Miller
1996-12-18 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-18 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-12-19 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1996-12-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-12-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1996-12-12 0:00 ` Chris Brand
1996-12-13 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1996-12-14 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-12-14 0:00 ` BGaffney42
1996-12-19 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox