* runtime efficiency
@ 1996-10-26 0:00 Michiel Perdeck
1996-10-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michiel Perdeck @ 1996-10-26 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
I think that Ada can produce code that runs as fast as C++ code and is
nevertheless safer. But someone said that at least part of it's safety
must come from run-time checks, that inevitable slow down.
What do you think?
Regards, Michiel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: runtime efficiency
1996-10-26 0:00 runtime efficiency Michiel Perdeck
@ 1996-10-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert Dewar @ 1996-10-27 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Michael asks
"I think that Ada can produce code that runs as fast as C++ code and is
nevertheless safer. But someone said that at least part of it's safety
must come from run-time checks, that inevitable slow down.
What do you think?"
I think this has been discussed to death more than once on CLA! Really
we should have an archive of old threads that people can just go and
read, rather than rerunning them!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-10-27 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-10-26 0:00 runtime efficiency Michiel Perdeck
1996-10-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox