From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Garbage Collection vs. the DSA
Date: 1996/10/23
Date: 1996-10-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.846048897@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: JSA.96Oct22154903@alexandria
The point is, if the DSA had not been in the RM, ACT would not have a
DSA and so they would not have those $$ coming from attacted _new_ Ada
users.
I have no idea what you are talking about, we implement many things, some
in the RM (like DSA) others not (like all the DEC extended import export
pragmas), and the choice is based on customer demand!
That's the "too in-bred team" problem already mentioned.
How do you know? This seems to be an argument that goes like this.
I am right, I know I am.
Community X seems to disagree with me!
Therefore community X must be too inbred.
There is another conclusion from these premises!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-10-21 0:00 Garbage Collection vs. the DSA W. Wesley Groleau (Wes)
1996-10-22 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-10-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-10-23 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox