From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Rational vs SunAda
Date: 1996/09/05
Date: 1996-09-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.841979548@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: qw6zq35b8m6.fsf@gargantua.enst.fr
Sam said
"AFAIK, GNAT is not validated yet for Sun because noone paid for
it. You should contact support@gnat.com (right address ?) to get more
information about the validation process."
Right, GNAT is not yet validated on Solaris. The reason that Sam gives
is not quite right--it's more a simple matter of priorities and
scheduling.
Our plan is to validate a number of implementations
later this calendar year, including probably the Sun/Solaris port. We
will aim at 100% passage of all tests in the core and *all* optional
special needs annexes.
Our current status is that we are passing 100% of the basic C tests, virtually
all the B tests, and we are about 30 tests short on the Ada 95 C tests (that
figure includes the core and all the special needs annexes). We see no major
problems in passing these last few tests.
Robert Dewar
Ada Core Technologies
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-09-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-09-04 0:00 Rational vs SunAda David Chase
1996-09-04 0:00 ` David Mercer
1996-09-05 0:00 ` David Emery
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Greg Baker
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Jerome Desquilbet
1996-09-05 0:00 ` James Squire
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Dennison
1996-09-06 0:00 ` James Squire
1996-09-07 0:00 ` Dennison
1996-09-13 0:00 ` David Taylor
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox