From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: parameterless generics?
Date: 1996/07/12
Date: 1996-07-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.837149427@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4s48k9$3be$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com
Brian said
"Does anybody have a reason to use a generic (package or
subprogram) without a parameter? The language (Ada 83 at least)
seems to allow it, but everytime the generic is instantiated it
would produce an identical copy. Comments?
"
Such generics are often very useful, and very common in Ada code. You
missed one critical point. Each instantiation gets its own set of
package level variables.
For example a random number generic could read
generic
function random return float;
and each instance would have a separate seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-07-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-07-12 0:00 parameterless generics? Brian Gilbert
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Ray Blaak
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Mark A Biggar
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Laurent Guerby
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-07-22 0:00 ` Mats Weber
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Philip Brashear
1996-07-14 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Chris Papademetrious
1996-07-17 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-07-18 0:00 ` Martin Lorentzon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox