comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Assertions (was: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree))
Date: 1996/06/28
Date: 1996-06-28T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.835938804@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4qrljg$15l8@watnews1.watson.ibm.com


Norman Cohen said

"|> The third case that Robert mentioned -- an assertion that cannot affect
|> the behavior of the program in any way -- is quite impossible to define
|> in language terms.  It very well might be a useful thing, though.

Sounds like a comment to me (albeit with compile-time type checking).
"

Sorry, I was not clear, people still want the assertion checked at run
time, but they don't want the presence of the assertion to affect the
rest of the program in any other way.





  parent reply	other threads:[~1996-06-28  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4p0fdd$4ml@news.atlantic.net>
1996-06-04  0:00 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Peter Hermann
1996-06-04  0:00   ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-04  0:00     ` Peter Hermann
1996-06-04  0:00       ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-05  0:00         ` Michael David WINIKOFF
1996-06-07  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-04  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-06  0:00       ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-12  0:00       ` Help making ada pretty CSC Trusted Systems Group
1996-06-14  0:00         ` Sandy McPherson
1996-06-19  0:00         ` Ruediger Berlich
1996-06-05  0:00     ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Ian Ward
1996-06-05  0:00       ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-08  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-08  0:00           ` The Amorphous Mass
1996-06-09  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-08  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-05  0:00   ` ++           robin
1996-06-05  0:00     ` Ian Ward
1996-06-05  0:00       ` Ian Ward
1996-06-06  0:00         ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-07  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-10  0:00             ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-07  0:00           ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-08  0:00             ` O'Connor
1996-06-11  0:00           ` ++           robin
1996-06-11  0:00             ` David Weller
1996-06-11  0:00             ` Chris Warack <sys mgr>
1996-06-11  0:00             ` James_Rogers
1996-06-11  0:00               ` Kevin J. Weise
1996-06-11  0:00         ` ++           robin
1996-06-11  0:00           ` Ian Ward
1996-06-12  0:00             ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00               ` Ian Ward
1996-06-11  0:00       ` Jon S Anthony
     [not found]   ` <4p60nk$imd@euas20.eua.ericsson.se>
     [not found]     ` <4p8lmq$oq7@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
1996-06-11  0:00       ` ++           robin
1996-06-11  0:00         ` A. Grant
1996-06-12  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-17  0:00             ` A. Grant
1996-06-18  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-19  0:00             ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-20  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Adam Beneschan
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` Dale Stanbrough
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Adam Beneschan
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` hopkinc
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Lars Duening
1996-06-24  0:00                   ` Assertions (was: Re: next "big" language?? (disagree)) Robert A Duff
1996-06-24  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-25  0:00                       ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-28  0:00                         ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24  0:00                     ` Assertions (a different intent?) Gary McKee
     [not found]                     ` <4qrljg$15l8@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
1996-06-28  0:00                       ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Marc C. Brooks
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Marc C. Brooks
     [not found]                   ` <4qsbm7$r1s@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1996-06-28  0:00                     ` "Assert"? "Assume"? (was: next "big" language?? (disagree)) Alexander Bunkenburg
1996-06-28  0:00                       ` Ian Collier
1996-07-01  0:00                     ` Cameron Laird
1996-06-24  0:00                 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Keith Thompson
1996-06-25  0:00                   ` Simon Read
1996-06-25  0:00                   ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-25  0:00                 ` Brian Nettleton @pulsar
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-28  0:00                     ` Fergus Henderson
1996-06-28  0:00                       ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-30  0:00                         ` Fergus Henderson
1996-06-30  0:00                           ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-25  0:00                 ` Darin Johnson
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` Dale Stanbrough
1996-06-26  0:00                   ` A. Grant
1996-06-12  0:00           ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00             ` A. Grant
1996-06-14  0:00               ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-06-12  0:00         ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-06-12  0:00           ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00             ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1996-06-13  0:00               ` ++           robin
1996-06-13  0:00               ` ++           robin
1996-06-12  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-14  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-15  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-18  0:00     ` Adam Beneschan
1996-06-18  0:00   ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-28  0:00     ` Assertions (an heretic view) Michel Gauthier
1996-06-28  0:00       ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-28  0:00       ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-06  0:00 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) Dale Pontius
1996-06-11  0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-12  0:00 ` Help making ada pretty Pedro de las Heras
1996-06-18  0:00 ` next "big" language?? (disagree) ++           robin
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox