From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: A note on GNAT 3.05 performance
Date: 1996/06/22
Date: 1996-06-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.835454848@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4qeubm$8th@linus.mitre.org
Michael Brenner says
"Is this why djgpp DOS interrupts don't work any more...because
the structure containing the registers is a record type?"
Please report the behavior you are seeing, with an exact example to
report@gnat.com. The folks maintaining the DOS port at ACT do not
read CLA.
Sorry to sound like a broken record on this, but it seems a continual
problem that people post GNAT reports to CLA without copying to
report@gnat.com. Most of the people at ACT have abandoned reading CLA
(too high a noise to signal ratio), and I don't get on every day
necessarily any more (and I certainly do not forward bug reports
from CLA, since there is no simple way to do that for me while
retaining proper tracking headers, subject lines etc.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-06-20 0:00 A note on GNAT 3.05 performance Robert Dewar
1996-06-21 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner
1996-06-22 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-28 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-06-28 0:00 ` progers
1996-06-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox