From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: ACVC tests
Date: 1996/04/28
Date: 1996-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.830712056@schonberg> (raw)
John McCabe said
"When I have some time, or when I can persuade my company to let me, I
will look at the ACVC tests, but the fact that I haven't so far must
not exclude me from expressing opinions on the effect of the tests,
based on the experience I have of using the products that have
(mysteriously) passed the tests!"
Ah, that's the point. You don't have this experience, since there are
no products that have passed the new ACVC 2.1 regression suite yet,
and so to make judgments based on this kind of anecdotal experience,
we at least have to get the right anecdotes.
I was not suggesting a thorough review of the tests, just take a look
at a couple of the new tests, I think you will be surprised by the
significant difference in style.
next reply other threads:[~1996-04-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-28 0:00 Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-05-06 0:00 ` ACVC tests John McCabe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-04-28 0:00 Robert Dewar
1996-05-06 0:00 ` John McCabe
1996-05-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-05-07 0:00 ` Kevin D. Heatwole
1996-04-27 0:00 Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox