From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Task as a parameter!
Date: 1996/04/19
Date: 1996-04-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.829886642@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4l52dg$7qh@gulfa.kuwait.net
Ahmed says
"Is it possible to pass a Task as a prammerter ?
Can you imagin the impact on such scheme on distriputed systems?
better than that, imagin having an object class of Task and the task alocator
is a dynamic process that will detect the existance
of a new machice (potenctial procession node) to be binded on the
fly and the Task alocator will pass task object to it !!!
hmmm a mouth watering "PARADIGM" !!!!!"
Yes, of course it is possible, and is done frequently. In fact what is not
clear is why you think there would be a special rule preventing it. You
can pass any type object as a parameter.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-18 0:00 Task as a parameter! Ahmed A-Olaimi
1996-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox