From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Correction to previous post
Date: 1996/04/04
Date: 1996-04-04T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.828600513@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4ju209$mg4@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com
Mike said (with smiley)
": ... I certainly am not aware of any commercial compiler for
: Ada, C++, or even C that has been subjected to complete coverage and
: path testing (including of course use-def path testing, since that i
: is what is involved here).
How can we continue to claim that Ada is a better programming language
than C++, or even C, if we continue to group Ada with these languages
when it is convenient?"
Well of course we are not talking about use f the language here, but
implementation, and I regard the issues of implementing Ada to be similar
to those of implementing C++.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-03 0:00 Correction to previous post Robert Dewar
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Cordes MJ
1996-04-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-04-03 0:00 ` AdaWorks
1996-04-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox