From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada-95 for numerics?
Date: 1996/04/02
Date: 1996-04-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.828452857@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4jqofv$jtp@rigel.rz.uni-ulm.de
"Thanks for all your postings. First I want to make the following clear:
I am not criticizing the GNAT compiler --- sadly it is the only Ada-95
compiler I am able to use by now. And it is a fine thing to use."
No need to apologize, one of the things you should expect from GNAT
is good performance of generated code. RIght now GNAT will meet this
expectation for some cases but not others :-)
You did not say what machine you are on, or if you did I missed this,
please make this clear, it can make a BIG difference (i.e. do not
assume that GNAT performance measurements on one machine have any
relevance whatsoever to another machine!)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-04-02 0:00 Ada-95 for numerics? Joerg Rodemann
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-04-05 0:00 Dr J Parker
1996-04-02 0:00 Jean-Pierre Rosen
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-04-01 0:00 Joerg Rodemann
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-02 0:00 ` michael
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox