From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Q: on redefinition of "=
Date: 1996/04/01
Date: 1996-04-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.828416284@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4jp05jINNqo6@snoopy.cis.ohio-state.edu
"Anyway, in the design I'm currently working with all types must
support automatic initialization and finalization (and thus are
controlled types)"
This sounds truly awful. I wonder if whoever devised this approach has
any idea how much overhead this approach introduces, not to mention
complexity in the generated code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-04-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-30 0:00 Q: on redefinition of "= david scott gibson
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-04-01 0:00 ` david scott gibson
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Mike Young
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-02 0:00 ` david scott gibson
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-02 0:00 ` david scott gibson
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-02 0:00 ` david scott gibson
1996-04-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-04-03 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1996-04-01 0:00 ` david scott gibson
1996-04-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox