From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada95 for Windows 95 Reviewers Wanted
Date: 1996/03/26
Date: 1996-03-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.827847069@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4j82te$2am@azure.dstc.edu.au
"OTOH, if RR's bindings are "good" or even "half-way good", they could
and possibly should serve as an interim defacto standard."
I actually think that by FAR the mor important issue is to have a relatively
widely implemented thin binding. This is what tool vendors need, Relatively
few programs these days are written by making direct calls to the X or
windows interface, instead GUI's are built with high level tools. It is
these tools that need porting to Ada, and for that purpose a well designed,
universally implemented thin binding is what is needed. The intermetrics
bindings are intended as a candidate for this purpose.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-19 0:00 Ada95 for Windows 95 Reviewers Wanted Ian Goldberg
1996-03-21 0:00 ` Mitch Gart
1996-03-23 0:00 ` Stephen Crawley
1996-03-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Stephen Crawley
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-03-27 0:00 ` Stephen Crawley
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Jere W. Retzer
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-27 0:00 ` Tom Griest
1996-03-25 0:00 ` Jere W. Retzer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-03-25 0:00 Simon Johnston
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox