From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: parameters in bindings
Date: 1996/03/22
Date: 1996-03-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.827529457@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DooE1w.MCH.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
"This works but to me it seems ugly because extra access types are
introduced which are otherwise unnecessary."
That's odd, it's a bit like saying, I need some arrays, but I seem to have
to introduce some array types which are otherwise unnecessary.
Your argument is accurate, these extra access types are necessary. I
suggest introducing them in a child of Interfaces.C so that a standard
set is used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-22 0:00 parameters in bindings Mitch Gart
1996-03-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Mitch Gart
1996-03-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-23 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox