From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: GNAT going backwards?
Date: 1995/04/21
Date: 1995-04-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.798492015@gnat> (raw)
I don't normally post bug details on GNAT to CLA, but since Chuck Ebbert
posted the original report to CLA, it seemed appropriate to respond. Chuck
had identified a regression in GNAT on April 18th (which we filed as
[1618-003]). It was a small glitch with formal packages. It is now fixed
in GNAT version 2.05, which we hope to release sometime next week.
Furthermore, as is normally the case, this test now goes into our standard
regression suite which we run every night, and so that particular bug
should stay squelched :-)
As always, regressions are the nastiest kind of rodent life found infesting
GNAT, and we appreciate people reporting them.
reply other threads:[~1995-04-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox