From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.797290663@gnat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3m40vpINN3p8@RA.DEPT.CS.YALE.EDU
Tom Griest said:
"Since the formal parameters for your function are unconstrated types,
there is probably a dynmaic allocation/initialization/deallocation
of the dope vectors for each of the parameters. This might account
for some of the overhead."
nope, no dynamic alloocation is ever involved for bounds templates for
arrays in this situation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-06 0:00 GNAT function calling overhead Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robb Nebbe
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Duncan Sands
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Philip Brashear
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Tom Griest
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Theodore Dennison
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox