From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.797262157@gnat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1995Apr6.163740@di.epfl.ch
Robb comments that the bounds checks can make a difference, yes indeed!
and GNAT is not yet doing much on optimizing bounds checks. But if you
look at the post carefully, you will see that the comparison was with
checks turned off, at least that is the way I read it, in which case
more subtle things are at work!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-06 0:00 GNAT function calling overhead Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robb Nebbe
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Tom Griest
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Philip Brashear
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Theodore Dennison
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox