* Re: Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS
[not found] <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
@ 1994-09-02 14:02 ` Wayne Magor
[not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wayne Magor @ 1994-09-02 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>, bschiff@stc.lockheed.com (Barry Schiff) writes:
>It would have been nice if a portion of the parent's body was made visable
>to the child packages to solve this but I am sure this would cause other problems.
Make a private child package and put the declarations in that. The body
can "with" the private child.
Wayne.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS
[not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
@ 1994-09-05 7:21 ` D Elson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: D Elson @ 1994-09-05 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>If I depend on a child spec, which needs (at the spec level remember)
>visibility to some private declarations, which in turn require with
>dependencies on some units, then clearly all my clients are dependent
>on these units as well. There is no way around that.
No, there is not.
I have 2 more words to add to the discussion: "types packages"
Del
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1994-09-05 7:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
1994-09-02 14:02 ` Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS Wayne Magor
[not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
1994-09-05 7:21 ` D Elson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox