From: del@adied.oz.au (D Elson)
Subject: Re: Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 1994 07:21:25 GMT
Date: 1994-09-05T07:21:25+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <del.778749685@hawk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu
dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
>If I depend on a child spec, which needs (at the spec level remember)
>visibility to some private declarations, which in turn require with
>dependencies on some units, then clearly all my clients are dependent
>on these units as well. There is no way around that.
No, there is not.
I have 2 more words to add to the discussion: "types packages"
Del
prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-09-05 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1994Sep1.234903.1591@enterprise.rdd.lmsc.lockheed.com>
1994-09-02 14:02 ` Ada9x Question/Comment FOR EXPERTS Wayne Magor
[not found] ` <3476d0$7ea@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
1994-09-05 7:21 ` D Elson [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox