From: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Ada transformations with MetaScribe?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-03-11T12:37:09-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de60fe6c-38d6-4c57-9939-c80c35636370@y13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gp6qs5$j2i$1@octagram.motzarella.org
On 10 mar, 23:50, Ivan Levashew <octag...@bluebottle.com> wrote:
>
> I've got some success with GEMA.
>
> --
> If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom
I know it, and I've talked about Gema in a thread at comp.lang.ada two
months ago.
Any way, Gema and MetaScribe seems to be very different things : Gema
is a preprocessor without any predefined syntax (it requires an
external set of rules), and “that's all” . While MetaScribe comes with
a lot of formalisms and is clearly intended to deal with meta-datas
(as far as I've understood).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-11 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-10 22:13 Ada transformations with MetaScribe? Dimonax
2009-03-10 22:50 ` Ivan Levashew
2009-03-11 19:37 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) [this message]
2009-03-12 6:33 ` Ivan Levashew
2009-03-11 9:58 ` Martin
2009-03-11 19:33 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-03-12 22:25 ` Dimonax
2009-03-11 19:41 ` Ira Baxter
2009-03-12 22:28 ` Dimonax
2009-03-13 10:44 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox