Re: A Newbie to the group.

[adacrypt <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com>]

On Jun 15, 7:11 pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 15/06/2010 16:43, in article
> 26d9422f-e704-458b-a6eb-c7ec70a28...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
>
> "adacrypt" <austin.oby...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > ... I choose to learn Ada-95 in order to implement my
> > brainwave of factoring three-dimensional vectors and using three-
> > dimensional space as the encryption environment in cryptography - that
> > had been suggested to me by an Iraqi mathematician who had read my
> > work in factoring vectors and I was convinced that Ada-95 was the only
> > language for this ...
>
> Why?
>
> --
> Bill Findlay
> <surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk

Hi,

I take you mean why did I think Ada was the more suitable language?

I had already done some casual work on factorising large numbers in
Ada-83. I had been introduced to cryptography by one Dr. Chalabi who I
had asked to read my stuff on vector factoring (see "Factoring of
Vectors in Vector Cryptography" http://www.adacrypt.com)- he was
active in cryptography - I soon saw an algorithm in vector factoring
that is a one-way function in mathematics that is imminently suitable
for cryptography - it was pure instinct from there onwards but I was
convinced that the system structures of Ada-95 were ideal for what I
wanted to do in cryptography.  The mathematical algorithm was very
transparent to me but it was going to be a problem at the time to
implement it in Ada due largely to my inexperience of programming in
Ada-95 - I repeat that mathematical instinct was the driving force -
its the only thing I claim to have in abundance - I have taught myself
enough Ada just to complete this work - I am a retired engineer and
although I revere Ada programming I have no reason to go any deeper
into it in a general way - adacrypt