From: mhamel_98@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Direct_Io for Filesystem question
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2008-10-23T16:14:35-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dbd243e1-dbf9-43cf-a2ff-6d70e5327cab@v30g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: io6Mk.402077$yE1.45541@attbi_s21
On Oct 23, 2:54 pm, "Jeffrey R. Carter"
<spam.jrcarter....@spam.acm.org> wrote:
> You must serialize all accesses to the same file object.
I'm not *certain* I understand what you are saying, but my
interpretation of it led me to wrapping the direct_io.file_type and
its functionality in a protected type and bingo, all is well. I'm
curious if you meant something altogether different.
I guess "serializing access" should have been more obvious, and it did
occur to me (utilizing a protected type), I just felt since I wasn't
stomping on someone else's state I could bypass protecting the object,
guess not.
Thank you for the help!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-23 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-23 19:52 Direct_Io for Filesystem question mhamel_98
2008-10-23 21:54 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-10-23 23:14 ` mhamel_98 [this message]
2008-10-24 0:14 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-10-23 22:13 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox