From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: style Q: type .. is new String;
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:00:10 GMT
Date: 2004-01-09T00:00:10+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <damLb.1900$I06.12540@attbi_s01> (raw)
Though I create new types regularly for numeric variables, I've only
rarely used other than the standard String type. That saves doing type
conversions, but it would be nice to have strong type checking help me
detect errors. Do other folks use new String types a lot and find it
works out well?
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-09 0:00 tmoran [this message]
2004-01-09 2:31 ` style Q: type .. is new String; Stephen Leake
2004-01-09 2:58 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-09 16:10 ` Robert I. Eachus
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-09 17:17 amado.alves
[not found] <468D78E4EE5C6A4093A4C00F29DF513D04B82B19@VS2.hdi.tvcabo>
2004-01-09 17:34 ` Duncan Sands
2004-01-09 18:17 amado.alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox