From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: A copy question....
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 21:04:28 GMT
Date: 2001-10-15T21:04:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dale-FF763B.07031616102001@mec2.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9qehq6$t80$1@newstoo.ericsson.se
Petter Fryklund wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more efficient to let Int_Pointer point to an Array of
> Unsigned_32 and instead of looping just assign the value by means of:
>
> Array (0 .. 199) := Address_To_Int_Pointer (Address).all (0 .. 199);
I hadn't thought of that! Certainly better notationally - probably
more efficient at the computer level as well.
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-15 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-15 10:40 A copy question Zebylon
2001-10-15 11:21 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-15 11:30 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-15 11:59 ` Petter Fryklund
2001-10-15 21:04 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
2001-10-16 2:34 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-10-16 11:15 ` Dale Stanbrough
2001-10-15 13:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-15 13:30 ` Mark Doherty
2001-10-15 17:00 ` tmoran
2001-10-16 10:09 ` Mark Doherty
2001-10-17 0:18 ` tmoran
2001-10-17 1:14 ` David Botton
2001-10-16 23:00 ` David Botton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox