From: dale <dale@cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: HELP: renames and enum values
Date: 2000/04/09
Date: 2000-04-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dale-F87224.15225009042000@news.rmit.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8cp1hd$3so$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
> subtype x is y;
>
> why isn't that good enough for renaming purposes????
...because beginners don't think of it?
Is there any reason why it shouldn't work? (apart from being another
way to accomplish the same thing), i.e. is there some fundamental
philosoply embedded in Ada that means it would be a Bad Thing?
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <38ECE0EB.4BD4A53E@mindspring.com>
2000-04-07 0:00 ` HELP: renames and enum values Samuel T. Harris
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Al Johnston
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-09 0:00 ` dale [this message]
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2000-04-13 0:00 ` John English
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-14 0:00 ` John English
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-14 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Al Johnston
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Al Johnston
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox