From: dale <dale@cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Ada to Motif bindings
Date: 2000/04/06
Date: 2000-04-06T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dale-E9137D.14235906042000@news.rmit.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38EC2DC6.E17A407B@home.com
Glen Cornell wrote:
> Of course, there's the ever-present
> problems of converting Ada types to and from c types. For most X
> programmers, this is too much hassle to write an X application in Ada.
>
> [...] There just aren't that many
> programmers out there. Why? Because the language doesn't fit the
> Xlib/Xt/Xm model well.
I think it fits it as well as C does. The (limited set) of programs
that i've written were no more difficult than in C.
What features in Ada do you feel causes such a mismatch?
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-03 0:00 Ada to Motif bindings John Standard
2000-04-03 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ada to XRT bindings John Standard
2000-04-15 0:00 ` james hopper
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ada to Motif bindings Glen Cornell
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Marc CHEVRIER
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Glen Cornell
2000-04-06 0:00 ` dale [this message]
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Glen Cornell
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox