From: dale <dale@cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: with child: access to parent
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 10:34:58 +1000
Date: 2001-10-03T10:34:58+10:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dale-3D602F.10345803102001@news.rmit.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9pchrq$8vt$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Peter Hermann wrote:
> does this mean, that
>
> with a.b.c.d;
>
> is equivalent to
>
> with a;
> with a.b;
> with a.b.c;
> with a.b.c.d;
Probably worth mentioning that the semantics for "use" are
not the same.
e.g.
use a.b.c.d;
is not equivalent to...
use a;
use a.b;
use a.b.c;
use a.b.c.d;
Dale
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-03 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 10:06 with child: access to parent Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 10:49 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-02 12:53 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-10-02 14:25 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 14:44 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-02 14:10 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 14:17 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-02 15:17 ` Wes Groleau
2001-10-02 16:14 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-12 13:58 ` Simon Wright
2001-10-02 14:22 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-08 10:51 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-10-11 15:07 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-11 14:54 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-03 0:34 ` dale [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox