From: "chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Common sense...
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 21:16:06 +0100
Date: 2002-07-05T21:16:06+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9nV8.2473$7i3.155239@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EykV8.2130$7i3.128975@newsfep1-win.server.ntli.net
Hi (again),
the packages have to be as flexible as possible, supporting both bounded and
unbounded data structures.
Which of these two alternatives do ppl feel is better?
aqua.lists.linear.doubly.bounded & aqua.lists.linear.doubly.unbounded
or
aqua.bounded.lists.linear.doubly & aqua.unbounded.lists.linear.doubly
I have no real preference!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-05 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-05 17:19 Common sense chris.danx
2002-07-05 17:28 ` Wes Groleau
2002-07-05 17:58 ` chris.danx
2002-07-05 21:34 ` Wes Groleau
2002-07-05 18:31 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-07-05 18:54 ` chris.danx
2002-07-06 1:26 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-07-06 10:28 ` chris.danx
2002-07-06 20:07 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-07-06 6:52 ` Simon Wright
2002-07-05 20:16 ` chris.danx [this message]
2002-07-06 6:51 ` Simon Wright
2002-07-12 18:01 ` chris.danx
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox