From: jtg <jtg77@poczta.onet.pl>
Subject: Re: Ada-friendly MPI
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:08:46 +0200
Date: 2005-06-23T15:08:46+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9ec35$fou$1@korweta.task.gda.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uy892ssl1.fsf@obry.net>
Pascal Obry wrote:
> "*-> That Guy Downstairs <-*" <jtjammer@hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
>>Hi all,
>>I am looking at getting into a LAM-MPI system running Ada95 on Linux.
>
>
> Why not use the Distributed Annex (Annex-E) and the Ada's built-in
> parallelism support ?
>
As far as I am concerned Ada Distributed Annex is non-standard. :-(
All three supercomputers, that I had opportunity to use, supported MPI
only or MPI/PVM. I had no clue how to use Ada built-in parallelism
in these environments.
But I am interested in the subject. Do you know about environments
where Ada Distributed Annex is supported (and used)? Do you use it
yourself?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-23 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-22 4:48 Ada-friendly MPI *-> That Guy Downstairs <-*
2005-06-22 8:28 ` Pascal Obry
2005-06-23 13:08 ` jtg [this message]
2005-06-23 16:37 ` Pascal Obry
2005-06-23 20:26 ` jtg
2005-06-23 20:59 ` Pascal Obry
2005-06-23 22:14 ` jtg
2005-06-24 6:39 ` Pascal Obry
2005-06-24 10:31 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-06-25 6:33 ` jtg
2005-06-23 8:03 ` jtg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox