From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Ok to assume type Duration is for more than one day?
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2017-01-22T08:39:11-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7ddb5cb-44bd-4b33-b09a-068c21dad049@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52d00223-69b9-4a5c-a2e0-aaa906d9b200@googlegroups.com>
A.1(43) Duration is delta implementation-defined range implementation-defined;
1.1.3(18) Certain aspects of the semantics are defined to be either implementation defined or unspecified. In such cases, the set of possible effects is specified, and the implementation may choose any effect in the set.
Implementations shall document their behavior in implementation-defined situations, but documentation is not required for unspecified situations. The implementation-defined characteristics are summarized in M.2.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-22 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-22 11:37 Ok to assume type Duration is for more than one day? reinkor
2017-01-22 12:28 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-01-23 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-01-22 16:39 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2017-01-23 8:35 ` G.B.
2017-01-23 8:43 ` G.B.
2017-01-23 13:32 ` Björn Lundin
2017-01-23 13:53 ` G.B.
2017-01-23 14:32 ` Björn Lundin
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox