Re: DDS and Ada

[Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>]

On Jul 6, 9:27 pm, Martyn Pike <martyn at emconuk dot com> wrote:

> My interest is in the wider scope but specifically the interoperability
> of different solutions.
> I understand that different CORBA ORBs can talk to eachother but I am
> less convinced
> different DDS implementations can talk to eachother.

Not necessarily. If they can, their vendors make a big marketing
hoopla about it, which means that it is not expected out of the box.
In particular, I do not expect broker-based DDS to interoperate with a
broker-less DDS without any additional gateway/bridge on the way.

> So a C++ DDS
> publisher and an
> Ada DDS subscriber as per the spec is what I am looking for.

Then probably the best choice is to find a vendor who has a single
product with several language bindings.

May I ask you why do you insist on DDS, specifically? Is it mandated
by some higher authority or is it some very special feature/
requirement that can only be possibly met by a DDS implementation?

--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com