From: Aurele <aurele.vitali@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of SDLAda
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-09-12T14:39:16-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d4ecd931-9794-45aa-9d04-b05867294cf3@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nr0jhd$lf5$1@gioia.aioe.org>
> There is an unfinished binding to the SDL2 library called SDLAda
This looks like a "thick" binding to the SDL library:
https://www.libsdl.org/
Would having a "thin" binding to the SDL library not have been a better approach? And why are the API names all different (what happened to SDL_ from the name). Anyway, nice code. Does SDLAda offer more than whats already (and used) in the library?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-12 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-10 9:25 Status of SDLAda Michael B.
2016-09-12 1:10 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 1:12 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 19:40 ` Michael B.
2016-09-12 22:01 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-16 17:21 ` Michael B.
2016-09-16 20:58 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 21:39 ` Aurele [this message]
2016-09-12 22:57 ` Luke A. Guest
2016-09-12 23:33 ` Aurele
2016-09-13 1:00 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox