From: Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Differences with/without .all
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2008-03-17T14:17:36-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d480f8c2-f365-4efa-91e1-fe44631b7ccc@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 871w696pxz.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org
On Mar 17, 2:44 pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> The compiler is correct.
>
> 6.4(9): "When there is an actual_parameter_part, the prefix can be an
> implicit_dereference of an access-to-subprogram value."
The compiler is correct to reject the syntax. The compiler has a
defect, though, in that it states an incorrect reason for rejecting
the syntax.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-17 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-17 16:34 Differences with/without .all Alex R. Mosteo
2008-03-17 20:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-03-17 20:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-03-17 21:17 ` Eric Hughes [this message]
2008-03-17 21:21 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-03-17 22:51 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-03-18 15:35 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox