From: marciant@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: GNAT "alignment value must be positive"
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 08:27:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-04-07T08:27:55-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3ba102f-5e0a-4732-865b-a79d3bfee12b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0817bf94-0550-40c4-ba5f-f2ecd6383dbb@googlegroups.com>
Additional information:
(1) The alignment clause is for a record type,
(2) Ada95 mode is being used,
Additional analysis:
GNAT's sem_ch13.adb code unconditionally rejects zero for the alignment and thus seems to unconditionally not support items not necessarily aligned to byte boundaries. If that is the case then it would help if such a decision was documented in GNAT's implementation specific documentation: section 14 of the GNAT reference manual. (Maybe it is elsewhere I missed it. Did I?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-07 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-06 20:16 GNAT "alignment value must be positive" marciant
2015-04-06 20:48 ` Shark8
2015-04-07 15:28 ` marciant
2015-04-07 15:27 ` marciant [this message]
2015-04-07 18:46 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-04-07 19:45 ` marciant
2015-04-08 20:18 ` Randy Brukardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-08 20:35 Randy Brukardt
2015-04-09 13:28 ` marciant
2015-04-10 0:21 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-04-10 15:45 ` marciant
2015-04-10 21:18 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox