From: volkert@nivoba.de (Volkert)
Subject: Re: Ada and Design By Contract
Date: 24 Mar 2003 09:40:57 -0800
Date: 2003-03-24T17:40:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d37844cb.0303240940.13be700e@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3E7EE470.5030807@praxis-cs.co.uk
> To keept this thread under some sort of control, I suggest we agree a
> clear distinction between contracts enforced at run time (by the
> evaluation of checks and, typically, the raising of exceptions if the
> contract is vilated) and contracts enforced statically, prior to
> execuation (typically using proof technology).
I know Spark and i like it, but my question is more in the direction
of Eiffel-like Assertion mechanisms (runtime monitoring/checking).
> There have been some proposals for run-time assertions in Ada 0Y
> although many participants in the review process have found them
> wanting.
Can you/someone give me a pointer to it ...i found only
a paper from Ehud Lamm from the last Ada-Europe Meeting.
> The big problem here is that the really interesting
> contractual claims may involve items not visible at the point where the
> contract is being checked (unless the code is rewritten with reduced
> abstraction to make them visible).
I see not the problem. Can you give a short example.
Volkert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-24 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-23 18:55 Ada and Design By Contract Volkert
2003-03-24 9:41 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-03-24 10:56 ` Peter Amey
2003-03-24 17:40 ` Volkert [this message]
2003-03-24 20:11 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2003-03-25 8:04 ` Volkert
2003-03-25 8:25 ` Peter Amey
2003-03-25 9:55 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2003-03-25 10:09 ` Peter Amey
2003-03-26 9:00 ` Volkert
2003-03-26 9:00 ` Volkert
2003-03-26 9:38 ` Peter Amey
2003-03-26 19:00 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-03-26 19:32 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-03-27 6:59 ` Volkert
2003-03-25 10:44 `
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox