From: matthewmajka@mac.com (Matt Majka)
Subject: Re: Latest GNAT configuration
Date: 4 Sep 2002 15:14:28 -0700
Date: 2002-09-04T22:14:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d243f788.0209041414.76fe1d79@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87znuzorto.fsf@inf.enst.fr
Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net> wrote in message news:<87znuzorto.fsf@inf.enst.fr>...
> >>>>> "Matt" == Matt Majka <matthewmajka@mac.com> writes:
>
> Matt> If I use GNAT 3.14p, which is based on GCC-2.8.1, will there be
> Matt> any incompatibilities between my Ada object code and C or C++
> Matt> object code generated by the GCC-3 compilers?
>
> Which C++ compiler are you talking about? The C++ ABI of GCC 3.1 and
> GCC 3.2 are incompatible with each others...
>
> Sam
All C and C++ code will be using GCC 3.1.1. I hope to use the Ada
compiler in GCC 3.1.1 as well, but there appear to be GDB deficiencies
at this time. I am wondering if there are any known problems with
using GCC 2.8.1 for Ada and GCC 3.1.1 for all other code (C and C++)
in the same binary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-04 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-27 16:35 Latest GNAT configuration Matt Majka
2002-08-27 18:16 ` Florian Weimer
2002-09-03 18:17 ` Matt Majka
2002-09-03 18:23 ` Samuel Tardieu
2002-09-04 22:14 ` Matt Majka [this message]
2002-09-13 16:24 ` Ludovic Brenta
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox