From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Obtaining access to protected object
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2008-07-09T14:21:32-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d234e827-c3e6-481a-a15e-94382c2fbf6c@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 247f4dc5-44d8-4618-9fdf-140286ac8d0e@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com
On 9 Lip, 17:03, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> It's a compiler bug.
Reported to bugzilla.
I cannot believe nobody [*] tried it before.
[*] What about ACATS? My code example looks like a unit test derived
directly from AARM.
--
Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 20:41 Obtaining access to protected object Maciej Sobczak
2008-07-09 15:03 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-09 21:21 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2008-07-09 21:57 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-09 22:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-07-10 0:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-07-09 15:33 ` george.priv
2008-07-09 19:27 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-07-10 2:10 ` george.priv
2008-07-10 14:46 ` Adam Beneschan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox