From: Marin David Condic <nobody@noplace.com>
Subject: Re: Embedded
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 13:51:04 GMT
Date: 2005-08-20T13:51:04+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <czGNe.405$I93.280@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6yxNe.9353$RS.363@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Interesting in theory, but not very practical. In a commercial venture,
a LOT more depends on the actual processor chosen than does the language
of implementation of the software. For one thing, anything having to
do with the software implementation is a pure engineering cost whereas
the microprocessor has both an engineering cost AND a production cost.
Chip X has no Ada compiler and Chip Y does, but chip X is $0.10 cheaper,
has a better field reliability history, multiple suppliers, is better
suited to the existing production line equipment and we're expecting to
make 10,000,000 units so we'd better be sure there is sufficient supply.
Would you still choose chip Y because "Ada is Better!"? Are you going to
save enough on using Ada to justify all of the additional costs and risks?
This is why Ada has an uphill battle in the embedded market. If the
Adult Supervision around Ada wants to identify that market as the future
for Ada, then it needs to actually thoroughly understand what the needs
of that market are and be prepared to address them - or we end up using
C because that's what we have that we can get the job done with. Ada has
less than 1% of the embedded system market, so if that's its future, it
has a really tough row to hoe.
MDC
Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
>
> That's the usual way, but that's not necessarily a good way. A better
> way is to choose a suitable language, then choose the hardware to suit
> the language choice. Since Ada's about the only thing around that was
> designed for embedded systems, an unbiased selection of a suitable
> language will usually choose Ada.
--
======================================================================
Marin David Condic
I work for: http://www.belcan.com/
My project is: http://www.jsf.mil/NSFrames.htm
Send Replies To: m o d c @ a m o g
c n i c . r
"The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has
been found difficult; and left untried."
-- G. K. Chesterton
======================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-20 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 20:57 Embedded Lanarcam
2005-08-19 23:02 ` Embedded Martin Dowie
2005-08-20 3:35 ` Embedded Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-08-20 13:51 ` Marin David Condic [this message]
2005-08-24 18:00 ` Embedded Colin Paul Gloster
2005-08-24 20:38 ` Embedded Lanarcam
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox