comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 & IEEE 754r ?
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2005-02-02T17:43:51+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ctr3gn$d1d$1@titan.btinternet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107359947.724262.52490@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>

britt@acm.org wrote:
> Is anyone involved with the Ada 2005 revision also tracking the
> proposed changed to IEEE-STD-754 (the binary floating point arithmetic
> standard)? I'm asking because the draft of 754r cites several languages
> (C99, Java,C Fortran, PL/1, COBOL) in its rationale but it doesn't
> mention Ada anywhere. The revised standard defines new decimal
> arithmetic types and it would be a bad thing if they are somehow
> incompatable with decimal types in Ada. I don't know enough to evaluate
> this myself so I'm hoping someone else can look at this and see if
> there are any potential conflicts.
> 
> See http://754r.ucbtest.org/drafts/754r.pdf and
> http://754r.ucbtest.org/ for more information.

From:
Minutes of the 24th ARG Meeting, 17-19 September 2004,
Madison, Wisconsin, USA

"AI-315/02 Full support for IEC 559:1989 (Other AI versions)

  Pascal (the AI�s author) proposes No Action. There is a big
  implementation impact, and it�s unclear that there is sufficient
  demand. Tucker wonders if we should encourage implementations to follow
  this model. Pascal says that there are problems with it; being able to
  query flags has a significant negative impact on instruction
  scheduling. So you�d have to do operations in order, which would negate
  11.6. Tucker says this still a good place to start. Steve says that
  doing this would require a non-standard mode for an implementation.

  Erhard would like to leave it open for the future, as this is a good
  idea that we couldn�t finish satisfactorily. Some AIs have been around
  for a long time (e.g. AI-51). Pascal would not like to leave it open;
  he prefers a clean list of AIs. Other AIs (like preconditions) would be
  also fall into the category of good ideas that we didn�t have
  sufficient time/effort/experience with.

  John volunteers to put information about AIs that might be good ideas
  but we couldn�t finish into the Rationale.

  No Action: 8-0-1."

Cheers

-- Martin



      reply	other threads:[~2005-02-02 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-02 15:59 Ada 2005 & IEEE 754r ? britt
2005-02-02 17:43 ` Martin Dowie [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox