From: Jeffrey Carter <spam@spam.com>
Subject: Re: Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 01:07:20 GMT
Date: 2003-12-11T01:07:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <crPBb.9463$rP6.3773@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Hpp3r9.6L0@news.boeing.com>
Greg Milford wrote:
> I checked the FAQ for this group and did not get an answer to this. I know
> Ada does not have a preprocessor, so how should I go about maintaining
> changes to a common code base that needs to be built under two different
> configurations?
Generally, you define a package specification for the functionality you
require, then implement different bodies for it for the different
situations.
--
Jeff Carter
"Perfidious English mouse-dropping hoarders."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-11 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 20:04 Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed Greg Milford
2003-12-10 21:41 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-12-11 17:12 ` sed and perl - yuck [Was Re: Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed] Martin Krischik
2003-12-16 0:40 ` Waldek Hebisch
2003-12-16 20:52 ` Martin Krischik
2003-12-10 22:29 ` Preprocessor functionality equivalent ideas needed Georg Bauhaus
2003-12-12 5:52 ` Simon Wright
2003-12-11 1:07 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2003-12-11 13:34 ` Marin David Condic
2003-12-11 17:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-12-11 5:39 ` Steve
2003-12-11 16:59 ` Martin Krischik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-11 12:52 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-12-11 15:51 Lionel.DRAGHI
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox