From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Short circuit boolean evaluation
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:03:36 GMT
Date: 2003-11-06T23:03:36+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <crAqb.130954$HS4.1030055@attbi_s01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87f5a614.0311061144.360b3325@posting.google.com
> short-circuit has clearly proved to be better
Says who? I claim short-circuit is clearly worse. Do you have any
evidence otherwise?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-06 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-05 23:28 Short circuit boolean evaluation svaa
2003-11-06 3:49 ` Steve
2003-11-06 19:44 ` svaa
2003-11-06 23:03 ` tmoran [this message]
2003-11-07 0:26 ` Mark Lorenzen
2003-11-07 21:27 ` Simon Wright
2003-11-07 22:59 ` Mark Lorenzen
2003-11-07 2:29 ` Wes Groleau
2003-11-07 3:48 ` Steve
2003-11-10 11:18 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-11-07 0:49 ` Gautier Write-only
2003-11-07 3:03 ` Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2003-11-10 17:36 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox